ArcGIS-ESRILeisure / inspiration

ArcGumentos nothing spatial

But the first time I saw you I got the impression that Plot Your styles were out of my level, maybe because that first version they showed me was very neatly adjusted to your tastes; I even thought it was Geopdf since those days.  Sadness_imagem Then I got confused with the basics rgb your labels, that's why I had the courage to explore the map view and discover that you did not seem so complicated. 

Difficult to understand while you preferred to cut your veins with the archaic Advent, You pretended to be migrating to Avenue And half the time you invest it in Shape files Which I enjoyed every weekend ... regardless of which in every extension That we used would have a file with the same tedious name and three letters after the point ... until we landed in the fragility of the Prg.

No, it's that things are not always complicated, but I'm honest, some of your criteria Topological Now they are out of any mortal, before solved in other ways ... but not ... only in the Geodatabase And that cliché that everything is enterprise crushes me. Yes I love your new Feature classes, you s domains, You look very beautiful especially when you see me singing in that smile that scratches the nostalgia ... that of the first week, when we evaded the additional file Mrsid. Then Ecw Vilmente stole the idea but I miss that simplicity of the highest levels of your Mdt, with Rendered By default but without extreme smoothing.

No, it's always strange to see you, what happens is that now you put a price on everything WMS It gets complicated, I would expect nothing less from you. Feature services And above 1.03. No, the standards OGC I do not care, even if I had to leave via ArcIms, Break my coconut with ArcObjects And tunnel in ArcSDE; As long as you guarantee that you will do it directly from the base of Oracle 10g.

We here, we have solved many things with the API de javascript, most, when someone has asked. If it were up to me, I flirted with him Open SourceMaybe kind BSD Although it was not necessary; But I tell you, if it were you and the model included rebuilding the original scenario at the level of also information, I would be willing to migrate a good part of my days to Dbf Simple, it does not matter records And spend a good time on the table characters. Well, only in extremes, not to put an accent on baby, it sounds richer bb but because of the question marks, that was what caused the indexed The last time.

I? I prefer C # .NET y Flex, Python So that they do not forget me, JDK so the other half won't know. Nothing heavy on the desktop, everything from the server Implementation due to the brand And I am satisfied, although we also work with the competition, a fortune, but here between us, in my Acer I carry Qgis portable To remember that one day the world had 16 bits

No, I do not expect what cannot be. Be fine.

Golgi Alvarez

Writer, researcher, specialist in Land Management Models. He has participated in the conceptualization and implementation of models such as: National Property Administration System SINAP in Honduras, Management Model of Joint Municipalities in Honduras, Integrated Cadastre-Registry Management Model in Nicaragua, Territory Administration System SAT in Colombia . Editor of the Geofumadas knowledge blog since 2007 and creator of the AulaGEO Academy that includes more than 100 courses on GIS - CAD - BIM - Digital Twins topics.

Related Articles

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Back to top button