27 Years of Microstation

Microstation xm

We recently talked about the arrival of AutoCAD in its 25 years and the 6 Lessons Learned of its history. Because Microstation is one of the CAD platforms with great competition in this market, and certainly one of the few remaining with a whole generation of systems that AutoCAD managed to overshadow (in sales) I think it is worth taking a look at the Microstation history.

Microstation was born two years before AutoCAD (1980), as a university project of the Bentley brothers, although initially the pretension was not a computer program but an operating system that was able to generate graphics, so it was quite linked to «a station of work "that included not only computer application but equipment, at that time linked to Intergraph (Now by Hellman & Friedman) from whom he partially disconnected a few years later.

But how does a university project of a group of engineering gurus get to become a company that in 2007 achieved 389 millions of dollars profit? (AutoDesk reported $ 1,800) let's see some of its lessons implemented

FIRST LESSON If there is no hardware that supports our idea, then let's build it
1980- 1986
Pseudo Station
At this time Microstation is a system oriented to read interactive graphics assisted by computers (IGDS), these workstations of Intergraph that since 1969 had been developing high performance technologies.
Throughout this period AutoCAD was struggling from its 1.4 version to the 2.4, everything was DOS and had been popularized with the majority of commands until today known Divide, Explode, Extend, Measure, Offset, Rotate, Scale, Stretch, Trim.
Microstation 2.0
This is the first official version of Microstation under the dgn file format (DesiGN file).
This coincided with the launch of AutoCAD 2.6, at the time it started to acquire Softdesk and DataCAD ArchiCAD. However, Microstation was still an application that ran separately within PCs, under the well-known "ustation" that emulated a CAD application that was maintained until the V8 version of the year 2000
SECOND LESSON Find your best competitor and try to impress your customers. Microstation imports dwg data.
Microstation 3.0
Microstation tries to gain the advantage to its competition with greater productivity, everything ran faster in Microstation and had no problems with Mac.
In this period AutoCAD R10 purchases the users of GenericCAD (850,000) and reaches one million users.
Microstation 4.0
Microstation implements most things that users would love: fences, references, clipping, level names, dwg translator.
In this time AutoCAD struggled to be compatible with Mac, most of these changes would be introduced until the 12 R1992 version, it was obvious, Microstation was winning in innovation but it was a small application that important companies were adopting.
Microstation 5.0
Microstation integrates rasters handling in binary form, line styles and sizing.
In this period AutoCAD released its version R13, for windows and fails to be compatible with UNIX and Mac.
THIRD LESSON If you are not the greatest, then try to be the best.
Microstation 95
Microstation launches its 5.5 version, working on 32 bits in the era of windows95, introducing Accudraw tools (snaps), dialog windows, execution of multiple files and smartlines. This was the latest version compatible with Mac and Linux.
In this period AutoCAD R13 still in 16 bits decides not to work more for Mac until the year 2000, it buys companies to specialize lines of Architecture and Civil Engineering.
Microstation SE
Microstation launches its 5.7 version with Office2007-style color and border-like icons, this was one of the versions that many continued to use for many years, introduced power selector and some functionality to work on the Internet that AutoCAD would implement until the year 2000 .
In this period, AutoCAD launches R14 and the LT «light» versions emerge to compete on prices with DataCAD and MiniCAD, AutoCAD owns the market, they were years of Windows 98.
QUARTER LESSON Do not modify interoperability much, or your users will hate you.
Microstation J
Microstation launches its 7.0 version, emphasizing Java development and some of QuickvisionGL, previously operated with Basic and MDL; This version of files called Dgn V7 was the last one based on the IDGS that was used by 20 years, from the version 8 the IEEE-754 format was used.
In this period, AtuoCAD 2000 (R15) had made a great impression, was the owner of the CAD market and was looking for the user to leave the command line on one side. Years when windows 2000 would revolutionize the use of the mouse, AutoCAD fights for prices with AutoCAD LT and keeps few changes until the 2002 version.
FIFTH LESSON If your competition is too big, try to enter your own terrain. Microstation V8 reads native dwg.
Microstation V8
With the launch of Microstation V8, it is sought not to "seem strange" when integrating 64 bits compatibility, reading and editing dwg natively, digital signature of plans, historical file and reduction of levels limits, undo, file sizes. MicrostationV8 seeks to improve what AutoCAD does best, such as managing layouts by introducing models, snaps functionality (accusnap). Even with all these changes, Microstation works under «ustation», which keeps it with that strange way of not affecting the RAM memory, therefore greater productivity.
It also integrates VBA programming, and standardizes its bizarre way of controlling working units.
At this time, AutoCAD integrates the dwf and CADstandard formats, although the cost is to stop supporting users prior to AutoCAD 2000. The functionality of AutoCAD searches for many commands to pass from the text bar to windows.
Microstation V8.5
Microstation seeks to continue reading dwg CADstandard files and implements multiple-snaps and PDF creation.
In this time AutoCAD 2005 (R17) implements many improvements in the interface of popup windows, such as dynamic blocks, tables and the sizing becomes friendly.
XNUMXth week LESSON Well, what's wrong with looking like the competition?
Microstation V8XM
Microstation XM (8.9 version) is reconstructed from scratch (it is supposed), previously it came from a Clipper language, now it is developed in .NET infrastructure trying not to "look weird" so that it no longer works as a subsystem (ustation), although manages to maintain its productivity capacity without killing RAM. XM tries to maintain the V8 appearance, improving the features "because they have loved it" and integrates PDF external references, element templates, Pantone and Ral color management and improves the appearance in a certain similarity to AutoCAD.
Bentley launched Microstation XM as a "provisional" version, promising for the 2008 year a platform that has remained under great expectation, at one time he called it "Mozart", also "Athens", everything remains a great secret.
At this time AutoCAD 2007 improves the rendering capabilities, and for the 2008 version you can import dgn files. Improve some things that were always complicated (sizing and printing) and improve the ability to work with other "no cad" programs

It is clear that the competition between AutoCAD and Microstation has been unfair in a certain sense for 15 years; While AutoCAD is the giant of CAD platforms, Microstation was able to sustain without making many acquisitions or changing its format but competing strongly in its field: geo-engineering. What happens is that in these times, companies that compete at this level not only depend on the technical aspects but also on the international behavior of stock exchanges and things that are difficult to visualize in the long term.

Both companies (AutoDesk and Bentley) Have different strategies to operate and sell, finally in different proportions has worked.

There is something worth admiring from Microstation, and it is the fidelity that it achieves with its users, similar to what happens with Mac. Evangelizing a Microstation user to speak badly about his system is very difficult, the same happens with users of AutoCAD although in practice both have installed the two tools ... and possibly both are pirated :).

This competition takes 25 years, how much this can be sustained is a matter of time, and time in technology

Can be two years.

Update: In 2011 has been published a more updated article of this, which summarizes The history of AutoCAD and Microstation.

11 Replies to "27 Years of Microstation"

  1. The post is missing the latest version of Microstation, which is Microstation 8.11 V8i, which was released in 2008, and of which there is a build called V8i Select Series released in 2009.

  2. Of course, Autodesk will always have a greater participation in the market, that can not be overcome bentley ... as esri, microsoft ...

  3. I really liked the review on these two companies, I really congratulate you, but keep in mind that the economic power that Autedesk has today is much greater than that of Bentley, and from there it can make a difference. In addition Autodesk is taking over all new software that comes to market

  4. I have a hard time, it has been a long time since we used those versions of microstation ... to see if someone else helps us.

    Interesting that those versions live alive, with a good level of appreciation

  5. Hello ...
    I would like to consult how I can configure for the microsstation program SE to be able to print fine .... Because I used the 95 microstatio and prints very well ... but that does not happen the same as in the SE version, so I have to be printing on the 95 ...

    Waiting for your reply, I say goodbye, greetings ...


  7. From 1991 use Microstation (3 version) I remain faithful and hopefully enduring other 25 years of competition, it is always good to have another option ...

  8. Yes! In fact I was going to ask you to let me post an entry in Geofumadas

  9. 10 things that I do not forgive Microstation

    Go ahead that I am a user of Microstation since its 4 version and I have never had to use Autocad ....

    1. The limitation of 32 MB to the 8 version.
    2. LV, CO, WT & ST as a combination used to define entities, without being able to define layers or numerical codes.
    3. The programming in MDL (the Most Dificult Language) that made us look silly before the difficulty that it supposed.
    4. The UCM's and VBA for applications that always had insufficient capacity because they did not allow to modify elements.
    5. That they did not know to substitute the CDM language, they tried with JAVA and soon they left it.
    6. That they abandon other Operating Systems.
    7. They have not published the format of the 8 version. The former was always documented.
    8. That the V7 MDLs with respect to the V8 and XM are incompatible.
    9. They have implemented the XM version with .NET.
    10. That the XM version is not presented as final and involves uncertainty.

Leave an answer

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.